Businesses are in a rush to get small cell wireless attachments deployed. Competitors are entering the field and practically racing to the utility poles and other infrastructure anticipating the rollout of next generation wireless technology. Some companies plan to introduce fixed 5G service by the end of year, with larger-scale rollouts in 2020 and beyond.
Communications companies are counting on small cell deployment to support new technologies, eliminating coverage drops in dense urban settings and providing seamless access to 5G’s ultra-fast speeds.
Small cell is a compact antenna systems designed to serve limited areas. They are typically attached to utility poles, street light poles, or mounted on buildings.
The number of small cell attachments in the United States, amounted to roughly 13,000 in 2017, is expected to increase to 100,000 and perhaps even 150,000 by the end of this year, according to the Federal Communications Commission. These numbers leap to an estimated 450,000 by 2020 and 800,000 by 2026.
The point of small cell deployment – better, faster, more reliable and versatile wireless service – will be negated if the backhaul (that pulls information from the core network to the small cell) isn’t ready for the task. End-to-end high performance is necessary to satisfy consumers’ service expectations.
Fiber is ideally suited to meet the growing demands placed on wireless services, such as faster upload speeds to accommodate the growing number of sensors connecting automobiles, home systems, and devices.
While fiber is positioned to be dominant now, several other forms of backhaul are available as practical alternatives, including copper ethernet, millimeter wave, microwave, and satellite.
In locations where fiber is already in place, it is likely to be used, even if it must be upgraded. Cost of upgrades can be justified by the competitive advantage and potential profits for companies who can quickly and smoothly supply reliable 5G service.
The cost is much greater to put fiber where it doesn’t already exist. Businesses may find that negotiating right-of-way agreements in some locations is time-consuming and causes unacceptable delays in small cell deployment. Creating street-level backhaul from scratch is a big job. Other backhaul solutions may be attractive alternatives to fiber in those situations.
Most often, communications providers will choose to use backhaul from the small cell to an existing macro cell, as long as the macro has adequate capacity to backhaul the combined traffic to the mobile telephone switching office (MTSO). The alternative would be backhauling directly from the small cell to the MTSO.
If the backhaul capacity from the macro to the MTSO is inadequate, industry experts suggest, the company should consider investing in an upgrade that includes plenty of capacity for future growth. The development of a bottleneck in the backhaul must be avoided. A management system that allows remote troubleshooting improves security.
The overall goal is consumer satisfaction—and for the consumer, the quality of wireless experience is everything.
3 Major Trials to Face
Taken together, these challenges are daunting. A logical, well-coordinated approach to backhaul decisions and small cell deployment in general is a key to delivering the quality of experience that wireless customers are demanding. The potential rewards offer the best possible incentive to get it right.
What backhaul issues have you encountered or do you anticipate in the deployment of small cell wireless attachments? Which backhaul solution or solutions do you think will work best for you? Join the conversation in the comments section below.